+43 Football (or soccer) should be played at 9 vs 9, amirite?

by Anonymous 1 week ago

No it shouldn't.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Resistance to change, you must be a fun person

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Thinking that your username is not racist, you must be an aggressive person

by Anonymous 1 week ago

How is my username racist lmfao??? Thinking that my username has anything to do with race, you must be a 0 IQ person.

by Zleffler 1 week ago

Attacking me on my IQ, you must be a person who speaks more than my 6 languages.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Ignoring my question, you must be a person who doesn't use any of those 6 languages to communicate effectively.

by Zleffler 1 week ago

One does not engage in an exchange with someone inferior, you must be a person with an inferior intellect

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Calling someone else racist while thinking you are superior, we have just gone full circle cause you must be a racist person.

by Zleffler 1 week ago

I am going to tell you a secret just because you find it boring, does not mean everybody does. Its not the most popular sport in the world because people think its boring.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

So you never Play football full pitch. Now its exhausting. 9 to 9 would be totally mess.

by Successful-Fill-723 1 week ago

They'd manage it at high level. Or make matches slightly shorter

by Anonymous 1 week ago

The amount of goals per game is increasing almost every year lately... And the quarter finals for the Champions League were absolutely phenomenal. Let this focus on tactics and athleticism cook for a little while longer and see how even more counterplay develops over time.

by ConsequenceBulky 1 week ago

Yeah except it's not the case, average goals are not increasing unless you take the C1 elimination matches as a sample

by Anonymous 1 week ago

LaLiga going from 2.5 per game to 2.8 per game over the course of 4 years is not an increase? What about the bundesliga reaching some pretty high peaks? Or serie A slowly but surely moving away from the grasps of catenaccio (this has been ongoing for way longer but its still relevant)? Nah, surely there is no general increase in offense. Surely there is less room for skill and individual qualities. Its not like Kevin de Bruyne is anything special with his passes, its all just a system and nothing more. So boring.

by ConsequenceBulky 1 week ago

I think most formations would go down to 1 striker and cause a few less goals to be scored, making it a bit more boring. Although I do see how less passing options might mean more riskier long balls and therefore more changes in possession.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Are you aware of TST? They have a way to end the game that I may want to see adapted to the matches

by Anonymous 1 week ago

Thick solid tight ?

by Anonymous 1 week ago

The Soccer Tournament. Teams like Burnley and Dortmund and Wrexham and Como fly to North Carolina to play a $1mil tournament. They end games on a goal every game, but the way they guarantee that goal is they decrease the players on the field by one every 5 minutes until someone scores. Sounds like something you'd be into.

by Anonymous 1 week ago

I think off-site should be ended, kick-in in stead of a throw in.

by Chelsearempel 1 week ago

I like the unpopular opinion

by Anonymous 1 week ago

don't hate the players, hate the game

by Anonymous 1 week ago

There's no space on the field?!!! The pitch needs to be reduced by a third. Maybe there would be some decent scoring

by Anonymous 1 week ago